Another headache
At the time when protests were continuing in the streets and Mousavi was not ready to accept his legal defeat, another highly respected supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appeared in his first public speech after the election. This time again, those countries had believed that he would play some moderate role and as published in many news then, may order for re-election. This was because in past he used to express his views mostly against Ahmadinejad's, mainly about latter's nuclear ambition. But he is not like Mousavi and he couldn't betray his country and majority of the people of Iran which he was well aware of.
In a surprising speech, he spoke in favor of published result and supported elected president and even warned western countries not to interfere in his nation's internal matter in anyway. In this way, this hero turned into a villain in the eyes of many western countries and became superhero for the most of Iranian people.
Why prediction of western countries went wrong?
Answer is simple.Mindset of those countries and their people either working in Iran or those dealing with the election was against Ahmadinejad and was only in favor of those who followed their order means, Mousavi.
They never cared about the supporters of Ahmadinejad.
BBC and CNN were always busy reporting the expectations of Mousavi and showing videos and functions organized by Mousavi. They never dared to talk with even a single supporter of Ahmadinejad. Poor these media! How could have had they reported about mass Ahmadinejad had when they were obeying their government's order. Important question arises here. How can these countries talk about freedom in other country when media in their own country are not enjoying the freedom?
Voters can never be wrong
When election is held at least not as done by Saddam Hussein in which the voting is done only for formality and result is known before holding the election which is not in the case of Iran, voters can never be wrong.
People know the exact leader who can run their country. Most of the American people knew Barack Obama can run their country better than his republican rival and so are Iranian people.
Mousavi can never be true leader
In his subconscious mind, Mr. Mousavi knows his defeat but he still can't accept this. Some thousands to a million votes can be fraud but as said by Khamenei, 11 million is never possible. What makes a leader best is
to accept his legal defeat. Again talking about America, John McCain in the president election and Hillary Clinton in nominee election of Democrat respected their people and quickly accepted the result I mean their results. With margin being much less than 11 million what if they acted in the same way was Mousavi is doing in Iran? This is 21st century. In any country, political awareness of it's people has increased to a greater extent.
Free Iran
First of all, as a sovereign country, Iran should be allowed to decide its internal matters on its own. How dare some western countries talk about election fraud only by hearing from Mousavi and his followers? Do they have any prove to justify their claim? Such claim should be as powerful to bring more than 11 million votes in the name of Mousavi.
I have seen some protesters in the streets carrying placards reading "Where's my vote? " This person clearly knew that he/she had voted and his candidate was defeated in the election. Then how cans such stupid question arises? If those western countries are speaking for human right and peace, why don't they ask Iranian leaders to seat in negotiation table and solve their problem? By encouraging the Mousavi supporters to come in the streets, aren't they working as a catalyst to bring more bloodshed? Is this the human right they are advocating? All people should be allowed to ask for their right and this applies for Mousavi supporters as well. But they should do this in a peaceful manner as far as possible. By clashing with their own fellow citizen, they will only weaken their country.
Read more...
